Frank Van Den Bleeken is currently serving a life sentence in Belgium for sexual assault and murder. Three years ago, he asked to be allowed to die arguing that, due to his psychiatric condition, he would forever be “a danger to society.” A panel of medical experts granted Van Den Bleeken the right to die.
Since Belgium legalized euthanasia in 2002, approximately 1,400 people per year choose to end their lives with the help of a Doctor. Euthanasia has always and will always be a contentious topic, and rightly so; it is not an issue that the human race should ever become complacent about. I personally, cautiously err on the side of supporting an individual’s right to choose what to do with their own life. Having never experienced excruciating and unceasing pain, nor having ever been told that the remainder of my life will consist of a slow and irremediable deterioration, I do not feel it right for me to judge those who choose to be euthanised. However, I believe that Belgium’s liberal approach to euthanasia has gone too far.
The case of Van Den Bleeken troubles me on many different levels. Whilst the prisoner has admitted he is a danger to society, he also commented: “What am I supposed to do? What’s the point in sitting here until the end of time and rotting away? I’d rather be euthanised.” Belgium outlawed Capital Punishment in 1996, and thus, Van Den Bleeken’s crime requires him to spend thirty years of his life in prison as punishment. Allowing him to be euthanised not only feels suspiciously like a masked version of the death penalty but also appears to offer him an “easy way out” and a means to escape his punishment. If Belgium is against the death penalty, it must firmly remain so, and not permit what appears to be a subtle re-branding.
Of greater concern is the fact that Van Den Bleeken had applied for a transfer to a specialized Psychiatric Centre in The Netherlands to enable him to address his psychiatric condition, however this request was denied. This is concrete proof that euthanasia, as many critics have suggested, is being used as an alternative to giving prisoners the care they need. We cannot allow thorough mental health treatment to be a less preferable option than killing the sufferer.
Even if we choose to temporarily ignore Van Den Bleeken’s mental ill health, the use of euthanasia in prisons is as pessimistic as it is disturbing. Euthanising prisoners who have committed horrific crimes denies them the opportunity for redemption. The feelings of guilt and hopelessness are an essential part of any rehabilitative process. In order to reform your life from one of violence, you have to develop a strong sense of empathy. When this begins to happen, prisoners can find themselves struggling to come to terms with their previous behaviour.
I have worked with young men, who have felt suicidally low as they slowly begin to realize the magnitude of the harm they have done. Yet these same young men, once they have overcome that period of darkness, have transformed in to wonderful, non-violent, productive citizens, many of whom now devote their lives to rehabilitating others.
I am certain, that many of these same young men, would, if they had known the opportunity was available, have asked to be euthanised. One young man I worked with spent five years feeling suicidal remorse for his crime, making several failed attempts, and he is only now recovering. Mental ill health and depression can take you to some very dark places. It is good support that should be offered in these cases, not the temptation of an easy death. Not surprisingly, Van Den Bleeken’s case has resulted in 15 more similar requests from other inmates since Monday.
Living in an increasingly business-led society, I worry too about the financial incentive behind allowing prisoners to be euthanised. Afterall, killing off long-term, expensive prisoners, is a sure way to save money. Maybe, I am being overly cynical. However, what I a sure of, is that when Van Den Bleeken is transferred from his prison in Bruges to a hospital to be euthanised, the price of human life will have become a little bit cheaper.
IMHO when I say “I dont suffer in that way so I can/t judge”, then I try not to do the opposite. No one knows this man’s symptoms. People don’t choose death to escape their wrongs. They choose death over life when they can not receive treatment for unrelenting pain. The point is how do people in a civilized society judge euthanasia for those with terminally ill severe pain……SJ
Hi Jay! Thanks for this. I will read those texts as well. Always good to learn more. I read ‘zero degrees of empathy’ which agrees with the idea that psychopathy is not a mental illness but rather a sever lack of empathy. I would agree with what you are saying if it weren’t for the fact that this man asked to be given treatment in The Netherlands in an attempt to see if he was curable and yet was denied it. If EVERYTHING had been tried and NOTHING had worked and he still made this request, I may feel differently but because that didn’t happen, I still think it is too uncomfortably close to being a convenient choice for the authorities. Thanks for commenting! Love to discuss.
Hi Jay! Thanks for this. I will read those texts as well. Always good to learn more. I read ‘zero degrees of empathy’ which agrees with the idea that psychopathy is not a mental illness but rather a severe lack of empathy. I would agree with what you are saying if it weren’t for the fact that this man asked to be given treatment in The Netherlands in an attempt to see if he was curable and yet was denied it. If EVERYTHING had been tried and NOTHING had worked and he still made this request, I may feel differently but because that didn’t happen, I still think it is too uncomfortably close to being a convenient choice for the authorities. Thanks for commenting! Love to discuss.
Then punish him properly, and let him live.
Rebecca Novell: you raise interesting points. However, they truly may be irrelevant in this case. Actually people called sociopaths/psychopaths/evil aren’t mentally ill per se, and are widely considered incurable, chiefly because they intensely look down on people whose empathy which doesnt serve selfish ends. This poser is asking for this. They’re letting him have it, and ensuring he’s no danger. Due to a hyporeactive autonomic nervous system, psychopaths [or what you prefer to call em] dont become depressed per se, . The Zero isis a special hell. Death be the kindest cut. Please read the psychiatric texts by Reid Maloy… Thanks for listening. Be careful out there. I wish you good fortune in your career.
Rebecca Novell: you raise interesting points. However, they truly may be irrelevant in this case. Actually people called sociopaths/psychopaths/evil aren’t mentally ill per se- Perhaps the worst of all Severe Personality Disorders, this is widely considered incurable, chiefly because they intensely look down on people whose empathy which doesnt serve selfish ends. This poser is asking for this. They’re letting him have it, and ensuring he’s no danger. Due to a hyporeactive autonomic nervous system, psychopaths [or what you prefer to call em] dont become depressed per se, . What they get is the Zero, a special hell. Death be the kindest cut. Please read the psychiatric texts by Reid Meloy and Salman Akhtar,. Thanks for listening. Be careful out there. I wish you good fortune in your career.