• About Us
  • Contact
  • Subscribe Now
  • Download App
  • Benefit Hub for Subscribers Only
SWHELPER - Social Work Helper
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Mental Health
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Disability
  • Webinars
  • Buy Merch
Find/Post Jobs
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Mental Health
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Disability
  • Webinars
  • Buy Merch
No Result
View All Result
SWHELPER - Social Work Helper
No Result
View All Result
Home Mental Health

Should Social Workers Use the DSM-5

Dr. Allen FrancesbyDr. Allen Frances
April 7, 2019
in Mental Health, Social Work
0
ADVERTISEMENT
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on PinterestShare via EmailShare on Reddit

Among the 500,000 mental health professionals in the US who will use the DSM 5, the 250,000 social workers (Center for Health Workforce Studies, 2006) comprise by far the largest group, followed by 120,000 mental health counselors (American Counseling Association, 2011), 93,000 psychologists (American Psychological Association, 2011), and 38,000 psychiatrists (American Psychiatric Association, 2011).

For many social workers, DSM is a daily companion having a dramatic impact on how they assess patients, make a diagnosis, and plan treatment. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) is the sole group that revises the DSM, despite the fact that psychiatrists account for only 7% of all mental health professionals and only 10% of all physicians who prescribe psychotropic medications.

dsm-5In the past, social workers and other mental health professionals have relied on APA and the DSM for guidance in the diagnosis process. And while previous DSMs have failed to achieve universal admiration, none has failed to achieve universal acceptance.

Certainly, there have been numerous controversies about the overall reliability of the system; its seeming tilt toward a biological approach; the relative lack of participation of professional groups other than psychiatry; and the inclusion and/or definition of particular mental disorders.  But no one questioned whether DSM should be used at all or suggested that there was an alternative way forward.

DSM-5 has changed the landscape by being so closed in its process, flawed in its execution, unrealistically ambitious in its hopes, and dangerous in its product that many mental health professionals may choose not to use it.

The work on DSM-5 has been secretive, geared less to protecting the public trust than to generating publishing profits for the American Psychiatric Association (APA). Participants were forced to sign confidentiality agreements, the scientific review has been conducted behind closed doors, and APA rebuffed a petition endorsed by fifty-one professional organizations for an open and independent review of its suggestions.

Everything about DSM 5 was done in a disorganized way: constant missing deadlines, inconsistent methods for conducting literature reviews, poor research design for the field trials, and finally the cancellation of the crucial quality control step because time was running out (Frances, 2010, 2012; Jones, 2012). This process has not inspired confidence.

The DSM-5 product is frightening in its over-inclusiveness- with lowered diagnostic thresholds across a number of disorders and the addition of many new “subthreshold” disorders.  The changes blur the boundaries between pathology and normal behavior, resulting in increased overall prevalence rates of mental disorders and many new false epidemics.  Millions of normal people will be mislabeled as mentally ill and subjected to stigma and to unnecessary treatment and testing.

This will exacerbate what is already a serious problem in the United States – the medicalization of normal behavior. We are already in the midst of a national glut of excessive medication use causing harmful and unnecessary side effects and complications. What can social workers do if they don’t like the DSM-5 final product?  Ignore it.

There is nothing official about DSM 5. There are no DSM 5 codes- all codes used for reimbursement are ICD-9-CM codes which are available for free on the internet. You can bypass DSM-5 altogether and instead use the readily available diagnostic codes of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). You can also continue to use DSM-IV diagnostic codes until oct 2014 when they will be replaced by ICD-10-CM which will also be available for free.

DSM is not mandatory for clinicians unless specifically required by their institutional settings (First, 2010).  In fact, the ICD is the only classification system approved by HIPAA (Department of Health and Human Services, 2009) – not the DSM classification.  As such, ICD codes meet all insurer-mandated and HIPAA coding requirements.

My advice- don’t buy DSM 5, don’t use it, don’t teach it.

References
American Counseling Association (ACA). (2011). 2011 statistics on mental health professions. Alexandria, VA: Author.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2011). American Psychiatric Association. Retrieved from http://www.psych.org/
American Psychological Association (APA). (2012). Support center: How many practicing psychologists are there in the United States?  Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/support/about/psych/numbers-us.aspx#answer
Center for Health Workforce Studies School of Public Health University at Albany. (2006). Licensed social workers in the United States, 2004. Available at http://workforce.socialworkers.org
Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). HIPAA administrative simplification: Modifications to medical data code set standards to adopt ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS. 45 CFR Part 162. Federal Register 74, no. 11 3328-62. Available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-743.pdf
First, M. B. (2010). Clinical utility in the revision of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41, 465-473.
Frances, A. J. (2012, November 13).  You can’t turn a sow’s ear into a silk purse. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/blog/frances/content/article/10168/2099456#
Jones, K. D. (2012). A critique of the DSM-5 field trials. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200, 517-519.
Regier, D. (2012, April). DSM-5 Field Trials: Reliability of the Categorical Diagnoses. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Philadelphia, PA.

Also View:
Can Congress Cure the Disorder in Mental Health 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Why the Rothman Commission was Created to Save Macro Practice Social Work

Next Post

Social Work and Mahatma Gandhi: Part III of IV

Dr. Allen Frances

Dr. Allen Frances

Allen Frances, M.D., was chair of the DSM-IV Task Force and of the department of psychiatry at Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. He is currently professor emeritus at Duke.

Related Posts

Treating Teen Addiction With Compassion and Empathy
Mental Health

UB Social Work Researcher Introduces a New Tool for Treating Alcohol and Drug Addiction

June 6, 2023
Do District-Based Elections For School Board Help Minority Candidates Get Elected?
News

NASW Opposes Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Exams

May 22, 2023
Journalist Turned Social Worker?
Opinion

Journalist Turned Social Worker?

May 23, 2023
Business

Technology and Entrepreneurship in Social Work

May 21, 2023
5 Ways To Boost Employee Wellbeing
Health

5 Ways To Boost Employee Wellbeing

May 21, 2023
Self Care is a Requirement
Mental Health

From Burnout to Firestarter

January 7, 2023
Next Post
Social Work and Mahatma Gandhi: Part III of IV

Social Work and Mahatma Gandhi: Part III of IV

E-Verify: Could It Be Used to Track All Citizens

E-Verify: Could It Be Used to Track All Citizens

Leave Comment
ADVERTISEMENT
GET THE LATEST NEWS!
Subscribe
We hate spam and never share your details.
×

Thank you!

What Can Be Done To Solve The Foster Care Crisis?

Ending the Therapeutic Relationship: Creative Termination Activities

May 19, 2023
Exploring Emotions: The Power of the Feelings Heart Exercise in Therapy

Exploring Emotions: The Power of the Feelings Heart Exercise in Therapy

May 19, 2023
Want to Work With Children: 5 Skills and Qualities You Should Be Working On

Want to Work With Children: 5 Skills and Qualities You Should Be Working On

May 19, 2023
ADVERTISEMENT

Connect With Us

Twitter
FlipboardInstagram
ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram TikTok
SWHELPER – Social Work Helper

  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Buy Merch
  • Terms of Service

© 2022 Social Work Helper, PBC

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • News
    • Culture
    • Technology
    • Politics
    • Criminal Justice
    • Social Work
    • Education
    • LGBTQ
    • Technology
    • Disability
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Webinars
  • Career Center
  • Subscriber Benefit Hub
  • Subscribe
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart

© 2022 Social Work Helper, PBC

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
Sign In with Linked In
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
Sign Up with Linked In
OR

Fill the forms below to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.