• About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Shop Merch
SWHELPER
  • Login
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • News
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Mental Health
  • LGBTQ
  • Justice
No Result
View All Result
Post Jobs
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • News
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Mental Health
  • LGBTQ
  • Justice
No Result
View All Result
SWHELPER
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Education

How Do We Measure Therapeutic Outcomes?

Chey HeapbyChey Heap
09/13/2016
in Education, Mental Health
0
How Do We Measure Therapeutic Outcomes?
0
SHARES
140
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

four-simple-5

The phrase evidence-based practice is now common parlance in mental health care. The call for using evidence-based practice can be heard across psychology, social work, psychiatry, occupational health, and a range of other professions.

Often, such “evidence” consists of data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised trials, case studies, qualitative focus groups and interviews, and a range of other sources.

Nevertheless, many decisions in mental health care, whilst being informed by such an evidence base, rely heavily on clinical judgement. As noted in Daniel Kahneman’s seminal Thinking, Fast and Slow, clinical judgement is often not as reliable as it seems, especially for longer term outcomes.

Then, there is also a need for practice-based evidence or the collection of evidence during on-the-ground work to measure outcomes for the individual client.

Unfortunately, the simple removal of psychiatric diagnosis (e.g. “You are no longer depressed”) cannot be considered an accurate measure of change for an person. For decades the unreliability of psychiatric diagnosis has been flagged as an issue and unfortunately not much has changed. Indeed, such diagnostic categories are not even considered scientifically valid.

However, range of scales and measures are available to monitor change for various problems. One example might be the Internal States Scale for someone having problems with fluctuating mood, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for someone who is feeling low, the Self-Compassion Scale for someone who is trying to develop compassion, or power mapping to measure someone’s level of personal control within their lives. Positive aspects of a person’s life can also be measured, such as user-defined recovery, quality of life, empowerment, and subjective wellbeing to name but a few.

Outcome measures can also be more tailored to the individual. Subjective units of distress, personal goals (with a clear 1-5 scale of how close one is to achieving the goals), subjective blob trees, and six part stories are other ways to measure the impact of interventions. In fact, such personalised measures may be more meaningful than a set of standardised questionnaires, which can often lack context.

Measures can be helpful to see whether an intervention is staying on track, and may give permission to discuss topics that are difficult to bring up (such as sex drive or self-harm). It may be that the professional has missed something in their questioning, which is revealed through outcome measures to be important to the client.

Clients may also value being able to review their progress, and there are some indications that the use of outcome measures can improve therapeutic outcomes. Outcome measures may additionally support the clinician to reflect upon their work, and ensure that the clinician’s views on progress match the client’s reality.

There are, however, some concerns about using outcome measures in clinical practice. This might include burden, time and paperwork for both client and professional, concerns about relevance and helpfulness of scales, and also concerns that any outcome scores may be misused by others. An over-reliance on scales to measure outcome may not be helpful or meaningful. Additionally, scales can only see a change in the concept that they are measuring – for example, a mood scale may miss out key components in somebody’s social life.

As such, like any clinical tool, outcome measures should be used in a person-centred fashion. Good clinical practice involves firstly using an outcome measure that is relevant to the individual. If a person who feels tired and low wants to get out more and make new friends, it may be helpful to set goals related to increased activity (rather than, say, simply using a scale of how low the person feels).

Secondly, an outcome measure should be feasible for the person. For some people, an hourly record of their day might be too much to ask, whereas for someone else it may be helpful and motivating. This can be subject to some experimentation and playfulness – the measure does not have to be “right” the first time but can be considered a work-in-progress.

Thirdly, an outcome measure should gather enough information to be useful, and no more. After all, measures take time and effort to fill in, and it is not ethical to ask someone to collect information that will not be used.

Finally, the progress of outcome measures should be shared and discussed with the client. They should not be collected simply for the sake of the professional, or the service, but should be a meaningful addition to any therapeutic intervention.

Therefore, whilst the concept of evidence-based practice is well known in mental health care, there is an important role for collecting outcome measures as part of everyday practice (practice-based-evidence). As long as such measures are focussed on outcomes which are meaningful to the client, and are used in an ethical and person-centred fashion, they can prove a valuable – if not integral – part of clinical work.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
Tags: clinicalevidence basedMental Healthpractice basedtherapeutic outcomes
Previous Post

Social Work Groups Join Forces with Rock the Vote to register voters

Next Post

Exploring the Components of the Conscious Service Approach

Next Post
Exploring the Components of the Conscious Service Approach

Exploring the Components of the Conscious Service Approach

Please login to join discussion
ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ending the Therapeutic Relationship: Creative Termination Activities

    Ending the Therapeutic Relationship: Creative Termination Activities

    94 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Feelings Are In Your Heart: An Art Therapy Exercise for Kids

    694 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Biopsychosocial Perspective to Mental Health and Illness

    3 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • My Journey as a Teacher and the Future of Education

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Fast and Furious Star Paul Walker Died During Charity Event for Philippines Typhoon Victims

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
ADVERTISEMENT
SWHELPER

We bring content to support you and the people you care about in their various stages of life. If you are searching in google on how to help or assist a loved one or yourself, check out our content.

LEARN MORE »

  • Terms of Service
  • Article Submissions
  • Advertising
  • Shop Merch

© 2024 SWHELPER.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
If You Enjoyed This Post
Join Our Newsletter
Subscribe
Give it a try, you can unsubscribe anytime.
Close
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • Category
    • Business
    • Culture
    • Economy
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Travel
    • Opinion
    • Politics
    • Tech
    • World
  • Find/Post Jobs
  • Contact Us
  • Shop Merch

© 2024 SWHELPER.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.